Student networks and educational social responsibility: promoting innovation through social marketing and digitalization

Authors

  • Daniela Rodríguez Mincey Universidad Austral
  • Franco Lagomarsino Universidad Austral
  • Sofía Fazio Universidad Austral
  • Reynaldo G. Rivera Universidad Austral

Keywords:

social marketing, digitalization, change management, social entrepreneurship, student organizations

Abstract

Social marketing strategies and digital transformation would facilitate innovation and sustainability of university educational responsibility programs through self-managed interdisciplinary networks of students. The article presents the case of an interdisciplinary network of university students that promotes the formation of proactive entrepreneurs committed to their professional, social and personal development in a context of cultural and technological transformation. While from its beginnings, in 2017 the initiative organized a range of face-to-face activities for students that fostered its growth and legitimization in the educational community, the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in early 2020 forced it to innovate in the use of digital tools. Thus originated CIMAS, a massive two-day streaming event based on a social marketing strategy and digital processes. The strategy fostered innovation and entrepreneurship, digitized the student network and increased its national positioning. This case study develops how the idea was approached through social marketing, and how lessons could be learned from the project to address digitization and new challenges ahead such as the pandemic and the new normal.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barabasi, A. (2016). Network Science. 1st edition. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

Berthelon, M., Bettinger, E., Kruger, D. y Montecinos-Pearce, A. (2019). The Structure of Peers: The Impact of Peer Networks on Academic Achievement. Research in Higher Education 60(7):931-59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-018-09543-7

Chaffey, D. (2020, 22 de agosto). RACE marketing model definition - What is?: Digital marketing Glossary. Recuperado el 15 de noviembre, 2020, de

https://www.davechaffey.com/digital-marketing-glossary/race-marketing-planning-model/

Dietrich, G. (2020, 7 de septiembre). What Is the PESO Model...and How Do I Use It? Recuperado el 15 de noviembre, 2020, de

https://spinsucks.com/communication/peso-model-breakdown/

Doran, G. T. (1981). There’s a S.M.A.R.T. Way to Write Management’s Goals and Objectives. Management Review, 70, 35-36. https://community.mis.temple.edu/mis0855002fall2015/files/2015/10/S.M.A.R.T-Way-Management-Review.pdf

Farris, P., Bendle, N., Pfeifer, P. y Reibstein, D. (2010). Marketing Metrics: The Definitive Guide to Measuring Marketing Performance. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.

Ferrer, Juan. (2014). Gestión del cambio. Colombia: LID Editorial Empresarial.

Godin, S. (2018). This is Marketing: You Can’t Be Seen Until You Learn To See. Portfolio Penguin.

González-Fernández, N., Menéndez-Novoa, J. L., Seoane-García, C. y San-Millán-Fernández, M. E. (2013). Revisión y propuesta de indicadores (KPI) de la Biblioteca en los medios sociales. Revista española de documentación científica, 36(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2013.1.919

Gosselin, M. (2005). An empirical study of performance measurement in manufacturing firms. International journal of productivity and performance management, 54(5-6), 419-437. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410400510604566

Hidalgo, C. (2016). Interdisciplinarity and Knowledge Networking: Co-Production of Climate-Authoritative Knowledge in Southern South America. Issues in Interdisciplinary Studies, 34, 183-199. https://interdisciplinarystudies.org/docs/Vol34_2016/10_pp_183-199.pdf

Kagermann, H., Wahlster, W. y Helbig, J. (2013). National Academy of Science and Engineering. Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative INDUSTRIE 4.0: Final report of the Industrie 4.0 Working Group. Munich, Germany: National Academy of Science and Engineering. https://www.din.de/blob/76902/e8cac883f42bf28536e7e8165993f1fd/recommendations-for-implementing-industry-4-0-data.pdf

Kiel, D., Arnold, C., Collisi, M. y Voigt, K. I. (2016, May). The impact of the industrial internet of things on established business models. In Proceedings of the 25th international association for management of technology (IAMOT) conference (pp. 673-695). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304495085_The_Impact_of_the_Industrial_Internet_of_Things_on_Established_Business_Models

Kotler, P. y Keller, K. L. (2012). Dirección de marketing. México: Pearson Educación.

Kotler, P. y Zaltman, G. (1971). Social marketing: an approach to planned social change. Journal of marketing, 35(3), 3-12. https://doi.org/10.2307/1249783

Latour, B. (1996). On actor-network theory: A few clarifications». Soziale Welt 47(4):369-81. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40878163

Rivera, R. (2016). Segmentación Relacional. Pamplona, España: Universidad de Navarra, Facultad de Comunicación.

Rosch, D. M., y Collins, J. D. (2017). The Significance of Student Organizations to Leadership Development. New Directions for Student Leadership 2017(155), 9-19. https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.20246

Sull, D. L. y Ruelas‐Gossi, A. (2010). Strategic orchestration. Business Strategy Review, 21(4), 58-63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8616.2010.00707.x

Published

2020-11-12

How to Cite

Rodríguez Mincey, D., Lagomarsino, F., Fazio, S., & Rivera, R. G. (2020). Student networks and educational social responsibility: promoting innovation through social marketing and digitalization. Responsibility and Sustainability, 5(1), 56–67. Retrieved from https://responsibility-sustainability.org/index.php/R-S/article/view/77

Issue

Section

Original Articles